Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Flowchart of the FPA algorithm.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Flowchart of the IFPA algorithm.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 1.

Parameters of the test function.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Performance comparison of four optimization algorithms of reference function f1f6.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Performance comparison of four optimization algorithms of reference functionf7 -f10.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 3.

Algorithm convergence curve.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Structure diagram of ELM network.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Flowchart of the IFPA-ELM model.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Flowchart of feature extraction of pipeline defect signal.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Table 4.

Peak-to-valley curve data of a single-peak–double-valley flux leakage signal.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Six features of pipeline defect signal.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Fig 7.

EMD diagram of a normal pipeline signal S1.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Fig 8.

EMD diagram of a pipeline pit defect signal S2.

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Fig 9.

EMD diagram of a pipeline crack defect signal S3.

More »

Fig 9 Expand

Fig 10.

Correlation coefficient plot of each IMF component and the original signal.

More »

Fig 10 Expand

Table 6.

Table of IMF components in relation to raw data.

More »

Table 6 Expand

Table 7.

Sample entropy of each IMF.

More »

Table 7 Expand

Table 8.

Main parameter settings of the optimisation algorithm.

More »

Table 8 Expand

Table 9.

Output results based on three algorithms.

More »

Table 9 Expand

Table 10.

Comparison of the identification rates of defective samples.

More »

Table 10 Expand