Fig 1.
Example summary of experiment depicting the presentation of conditions and vignettes.
Table 1.
Regression output for the effect of vignette group, rejection condition and EMSs on cognitive and emotional responses to interpersonal scenarios.
Table 2.
Regression output for the effect of rejection condition and EMSs on qualitatively coded behavioural responses to interpersonal scenarios.
Table 3.
Correlations (Pearson r) between total interpersonal response scores and trait interpersonal problems, rejection sensitivity and psychiatric symptom distress.
Table 4.
Qualitative categories for actions in response to interpersonal scenarios with examples, number of participants that endorsed the action (N) and their mean Inventory of Interpersonal Problem t-scores (IIP T-Score) and standard deviations (SD).
Table 5.
Observed percentages of participants that endorsed each qualitatively coded action across rejection conditions and their mean Inventory of Interpersonal Problem (IIP) t-score (standard deviation).
Fig 2.
Mean cognitive responses across conditions of interpersonal scenario rejection scored between 0 (Not at all rejected; Extremely unlikely) to 100 (Extremely rejected; Extremely likely).
Fig 3.
Mean emotional distress across conditions of interpersonal scenario rejection scored between 0 (Not at all upset or angry) to 100 (Extremely upset or angry).
Fig 4.
Probabilities of engaging in different types of actions by rejection condition and EMS score.