Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Characteristics of women food handlers at homes in Jordan (n = 1126).

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 1.

Food safety KAP score (mean and percentage) of respondents.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 2.

The proportion of accurate responses for the "personal hygiene" element given by 1126 respondents.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

The proportion of accurate responses for the "cross-contamination prevention" element given by 1126 respondents.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

The proportion of accurate responses for the "cleaning and sanitation" element given by 1126 respondents.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

The proportion of accurate responses for the "safe storage, thawing, cooking, keeping, and reheating of foods" element given by 1126 respondents.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

The proportion of accurate responses for the "health issues that would affect food safety" element was given by 1126 respondents.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

The proportion of accurate responses for the "symptoms of foodborne illnesses" element given by 1126 respondents.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Fig 8.

The proportion of accurate responses for the "COVID-19 KAP" element given by 1126 respondents.

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Table 2.

Query statements and responses on the improvements of participants’ food safety precautions during COVID-19.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

The relationship between food safety KAP scores and overall respondent characteristics.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Food safety KAP predictors using logistic regression analysis.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

The correlation between major food safety aspect ratings and improvements in participants’ food safety measures during COVID-19.

More »

Table 5 Expand