Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Graphical representation of the experimental protocol.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

(A) Change in SD during contractions at 25% MVC after each of the static stretch conditions. (B) Change in SD during contractions at 50% MVC after each of the static stretch conditions. (C) Change in SD during contractions at 75% MVC after each of the static stretch conditions. * = significant difference (P < 0.05) compared to the pre-stretch value.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 1.

Effect sizes (vs. pre values) for force control and EMG measures at each contraction intensity in each of the stretch conditions.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Magnitude of change in force control and EMG measures at each contraction intensity in each of the stretch conditions.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 3.

(A) Change in CV during contractions at 25% MVC after each of the static stretch conditions. (B) Change in CV during contractions at 50% MVC after each of the static stretch conditions. (C) Change in CV during contractions at 75% MVC after each of the static stretch conditions. * = significant difference (P < 0.05) compared to the pre-stretch value.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

(A) Change in ApEn during contractions at 25% MVC after each of the static stretch conditions. (B) Change in ApEn during contractions at 50% MVC after each of the static stretch conditions. (C) Change in ApEn during contractions at 75% MVC after each of the static stretch conditions. * = significant difference (P < 0.05) compared to the pre-stretch value.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

(A) Change in DFA α during contractions at 25% MVC after each of the static stretch conditions. (B) Change in DFA α during contractions at 50% MVC after each of the static stretch conditions. (C) Change in DFA α during contractions at 75% MVC after each of the static stretch conditions.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

(A) Change in arEMG during contractions at 25% MVC after each of the static stretch conditions. (B) Change in arEMG during contractions at 50% MVC after each of the static stretch conditions. (C) Change in arEMG during contractions at 75% MVC after each of the static stretch conditions. * = significant difference (P < 0.05) compared to the pre-stretch value.

More »

Fig 6 Expand