Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Survey flowchart of conjoint and causal mediation analyses via lucid (October 7–21, 2022).

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 1.

Considered attributes and attribute levels for artificial intelligence applications.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Support and trust marginal means by attribute levels.

Caption: AI-enabled technology attributes and support or trust for the technology. The figure shows the marginal means for each attribute value for support or trust in the hypothetical AI-enabled technology, as indicated by respondents after reading their assigned scenarios, on a 5-point scale (rescaled to vary from 0 to 1). Estimates are based on Table 2. Error bars represent 95% CIs around each point estimate.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 2.

Attributes and public preferences on ai-enabled technologies.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Support (Panel A) and Trust (Panel B) for Treatment Conditions Relative to the Control. Caption: Values represent changes in levels of support and trust for AI-enabled technologies by treatment conditions compared to the control condition. Values are negative because levels of support and trust drop compared to the control or baseline group.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Change in understanding for treatment conditions relative to the control.

Caption: Values represent changes in levels of support and trust for AI-enabled technologies by treatment conditions compared to the control condition.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Factors mediating trust in ai-enabled technology.

Caption: The top graph is for support, and the second graph is for trust. 95% confidence intervals are in whiskers about each point estimate. Whiskers that cross the dashed line at zero denote non-statistically significant results. Some values are negative because the effect of the mechanism acts in the opposite direction of the overall treatment effect.

More »

Fig 5 Expand