Table 1.
Description of facility characteristics.
Fig 1.
Performance of signal functions across all birth facilities in study settings in Argentina, Ghana, and India.
Table 2.
Performance of BEmONC functions among BEmONC-designated facilities in Ghana and India.
Table 3.
Performance of B/CEmONC functions among CEmONC-designated facilities in Argentina, Ghana and India.
Table 4.
Signal function performance versus facility documentation of corresponding obstetric complications in the previous three months.
Table 5.
Availability of 24/7 care, staffing, and essential drugs across EmONC facilities in Argentina, Ghana, and India.
Fig 2.
Percentage of facilities according to their highest level of validated EmONC functionality according to facility characteristics.
Table 6.
Number of EmONC and CEmONC facilities per 500,000 total population and 20,000 births in Argentina, Ghana, and India.
Fig 3.
Geographic distribution of population within two hours travel time of a partially functional EmONC facility.
Fig 4.
Geographic distribution of population within two hours travel time of a fully functional EmONC facility.
Table 7.
Proportion of the total population, women of reproductive age and births within 2-hours travel time of designated, partially functional and fully functional EmONC facilities in Argentina, Ghana and India.
Fig 5.
Comparison of indicators calculated based on facility functionality for Salta Province, Argentina—number of BEmONC facilities per 50k total population, BEmONC facilities per 20k births, percentage of the total population within 2 hours of a BEmONC facility, or percentage of births occurring within 2 hours of a BEmONC facility.