Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Overview of the demographic characteristics of the sample.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

The distribution and demographic characteristics of the investigated substance uses and behaviors.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 1.

Mental representations of the CoOp networks.

Each MR is visualized with different colors (purple:Guilt/Shame/Relief; blue: Stress/Relaxation; orange: Addiction/Health, green: Procrastination/Boredom). The sizes of a node and its label are proportional to the frequency of the given association. An edge means that two associations fall into a common MR in the consensus-partitioning procedure at least 40%.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Graphical representation of the differences in emotions between (A) psychoactive substance uses and potentially addictive behaviors and (B) between MRs.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 3.

Pairwise comparison of emotions across mental representations.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 3.

Graphical representation of differences in MRs between (A) psychoactive substance uses and potentially addictive behaviors, (B) low-intensity and high-intensity potentially addictive behaviors, and (C) low-intensity and high-intensity psychoactive substance uses. Colors indicate how far the observed frequencies deviate from what would be expected under the assumption of independence between the variables.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 4.

Participants’ characteristics according to mental representation membership.

More »

Table 4 Expand