Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Coordinates of air quality monitoring stations.

Location map of each air quality monitoring station in Beijing.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 1.

Name of air quality monitoring station.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Attributes of the correlation factors input when the model is making predictions.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 2.

Structure of the box line diagram.

A boxplot is a statistical graph showing the distribution of one or more sets of continuous quantitative data, the first quartile, the median, and the third quartile.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

The resulting graph of outliers is tested using a boxplot.

Taking the air quality monitoring station of the Aotizhongxin as an example, this research used the boxplot principle to test the outliers of the collected historical data.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Pre-processed data visualization.

Comparison of meteorological data and air pollutant concentration data before and after data preprocessing at the central station. (a) Visualization of unprocessed data. (b) Visualization of pre-processed data.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Time autocorrelation analysis.

The autocorrelation coefficient of each station changes with time delay of 0–24 hours.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Spatial correlation analysis.

Correlation coefficients of meteorological data and pollutant concentration data at each station.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

Model structure of Informer.

Informer model maintains encoder-decoder structure, and it adds ProbSpare self-attention mechanism, which effectively reduces time complexity and memory usage.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Fig 8.

Structure diagram of ST-Informer model.

A spatio-temporal embedding layer is added to the original Informer model to fully analyze the spatiotemporal characteristics of the input data.

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Table 3.

Setting of ST-Informer model parameters.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 9.

The value of the model evaluation index.

The values of the evaluation indicators obtained by predicting PM2.5 in different models.

More »

Fig 9 Expand

Table 4.

Compare the performance of different models.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Fig 10.

The results of four models to predict PM2.5 concentration in different time periods in the future.

(a) The results of four models predicting PM2.5 concentrations over the next 4 hours; (b) The results of four models predicting PM2.5 concentrations over the next 8 hours; (c) The results of four models predicting PM2.5 concentrations over the next 12 hours; (d) The results of four models predicting PM2.5 concentrations over the next 16 hours; (e) The results of four models predicting PM2.5 concentrations over the next 20 hours; (f) The results of four models predicting PM2.5 concentrations over the next 24 hours.

More »

Fig 10 Expand

Fig 11.

Predicted results of other air pollutant concentrations.

The ST-Informer model was used to predict 60-hour other air pollutant concentrations. (a) The results of the O3 concentration prediction. (b) The results of the SO2 concentration prediction. (c) The results of the NO2 concentration prediction. (d) The results of the PM10 concentration prediction.

More »

Fig 11 Expand