Table 1.
Demographics of participants according to department, profession and seniority.
Fig 1.
Distribution of STEN scores on the 16PF assessment for all participants (n = 63).
Fig 2.
Comparison between mean STEN profiles for our study population and selected populations within Cattell’s 16PF handbook [24].
Fig 3.
Variations in ranking of clinical stressors when analysed as all participants, emergency department and critical care.
Fig 4.
Participant agreement with measures of psychological safety (Participants contributing both qualitative and quantitative data, n = 58).
Fig 5.
Participant agreement with measures of psychological safety according to clinical department.
Fig 6.
Thematic framework with major themes and subthemes regarding the influence of personality.