Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Chloral hydrate anesthesia significantly increases latency of tail withdrawal from a nociceptive stimulus.

Within-subject comparison of tail withdrawal latencies to a nociceptive stimulus while unanesthetized and while subsequently anesthetized with chloral hydrate anesthesia (200mg/kg initial bolus; 150 mg/kg per hour continuous intravenous infusion). Withdrawal latencies increased significantly during chloral hydrate anesthesia in every rat tested (individual values represented in grey; average represented in black). ***p<0.0001.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Heart and respiratory rate remain unchanged during nociceptive stimulation under chloral hydrate anesthesia.

(A) Within-subject comparison of respiration rate 30 seconds pre-IR stimulus and during IR stimulus averaged over 3 separate trials (individual averages are represented in grey, grand average of all animals is represented in black). (B) Within-subject comparison of heart rate 30 seconds pre-IR stimulus and during IR stimulus averaged over 3 separate trials (individual averages are represented in grey, grand average of all animals is represented in black).

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Heart and respiratory rate remain unchanged with or without tail flick response during nociceptive stimulation under chloral hydrate anesthesia.

(A) Within-subject comparison of instantaneous (cycle-by-cycle) respiration rate (left) and heart rate (right) 30 seconds pre-IR stimulus (in black) and during IR stimulus (in red) for a single trial. The ramped thermal nociceptive stimulation was terminated at the arrowhead (14.5 s) due to a tail flick reaction. (B) Within-subject comparison of instantaneous (cycle-by-cycle) respiration rate (left) and heart rate (right) 30 seconds pre-IR stimulus (in black) and during IR stimulus (in red) for a single trial. The ramped thermal nociceptive stimulation was continued throughout the 30 s trial since no withdrawal occurred (C) Instantaneous respiration rate (left) and heart rate (right) during IR exposure for all trials (3 trials per animal). Each animal is denoted by a separate colour. (D) Linear fits of the instantaneous respiration rate (left) and heart rate (right) for individual trials during IR exposure, with each animal denoted by a separate colour, as in C. In no case was there a significant positive linear fit.

More »

Fig 3 Expand