Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Structure comparison of MAP30 and Momordin.

(A) MAP30 and (B) Momordin as viewed towards their respective active-sites, with key residues discussed in the text highlighted as follows: catalytic-site (green), Mn+2-binding site (yellow), and on the active-site-distal face, the ribosome-binding site (cyan) with the c11-P peptide-interacting Tyr residue (magenta). (C) Sequence alignment of MAP30 and Momordin with residues highlighted as above. Note that the structures for both MAP30 (PDB: 1D8V, 1CF5) and Momordin (PDB: 1MOM, 1AHA) are all missing 23 N-terminal residues. The C-terminal 19 residues are shown in the nuclear magnetic resonance structure of MAP30 (PDB: 1D8V) but not in the X-ray crystal structures of either protein. The N-terminal residues were missing, and C-terminal residues were present, on both proteins employed here.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

SARS-CoV-2 inhibition by MAP30 and Momordin.

Viral inhibition and cell viability as a function of concentration of MAP30 and Momordin, either without (A and B) or with (C and D) a C-terminally appended Tat cell penetration peptide, as assessed in the A549 NLRV assay. The results from this and other assays are summarized in Table 1.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 1.

Viral inhibition and cytotoxicity values of MAP30 and Momordin.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 3.

Mutation of MAP30.

Assessment of SARS-CoV-2 inhibition by MAP30, MAP30.Y70A, and MAP30.K171, K215 in the A549 NLRV assay. The Y70A active-site mutation abrogates both viral inhibition and cytotoxicity. The MAP30.K171, K215 ribosome-binding-site mutations result in an increase of both the IC50 and CC50 values, while the selectivity index (SI = CC50/IC50) remains the same.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Comparison of MAP30 and Momordin active-site faces.

(A-C) MAP30, TCS, and Momordin represented as hydrophobicity surfaces (blue, charged; orange, hydrophobic; white, neutral), (D-F) as charge surfaces (blue, basic; red, acidic; white, neutral), and (G-I) with residues scored as important by Evolutionary Trace shown in red. PDB codes and percent sequence identity to MAP30 as indicated. Ricin (PDB: 1APG, 30.5%) and Saporin (PDB: 1QI7, 23.5%) gave similar patterns (not shown). The binding groove with the catalytic site at the center is located between the two arrows in (A). The regions of the previously identified Mn+2 and Zn+2 binding areas are indicated in (D).

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Comparison of MAP30 and Momordin ribosome-binding-site faces.

(A-C) MAP30, TCS, and Momordin represented as hydrophobicity surfaces (blue, charged; orange, hydrophobic; white, neutral), (D-F) as charge surfaces (blue, basic; red, acidic; white, neutral), and (G-I) with residues scored as important by Evolutionary Trace shown in red. PDB codes and percent sequence identity to MAP30 as indicated. Ricin (PDB: 1APG, 30.5%) and Saporin (PDB: 1QI7, 23.5%) gave similar patterns (not shown). The c11-P peptide bound to TCS, and aligned to MAP30 and Momordin, is shown in magenta. The C-terminal end of the peptide is bound in a hydrophobic groove common to all the proteins (A-C) and the N-terminal end, with acidic resides D2, D3, and D4 (indicated by the arrow in D), likely interacts with a basic region on MAP30 but not the corresponding acidic region on Momordin (D and F). The hydrophobic groove (indicated by a dashed arrow in G), and particularly Y164 in MAP30 and Y166 in Momordin, appear to be important (G and I).

More »

Fig 5 Expand