Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Relationships between internal controls, financial accountability, and financial performance.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 1.

Demographic characteristics of respondents (n = 78).

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Multicollinearity evaluation among the internal control components (n = 78).

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Indicator reliability, construct reliability, and convergent validity (n = 78).

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Discriminant validity using Fornell and Larcker’s approach (n = 78).

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Discriminant validity assessment using the Heterotrait-Monotrait approach (n = 78).

More »

Table 5 Expand

Table 6.

Descriptive statistics of the partial least-squares-structural equation model (n = 78).

More »

Table 6 Expand

Fig 2.

Structural model used to test the direct influence of internal control components on financial performance (FP).

CA, control activities; IC, information communication; ME, monitoring and evaluation; RA, risk assessment.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Structural model testing for the direct influence of internal control components on financial accountability (FA).

CA, control activities; IC, information communication; ME, monitoring and evaluation; RA, risk assessment.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Structural model testing for financial accountability (FA) as a mediator between internal control and financial performance (FP).

CA, control activities; IC, information communication; ME, monitoring and evaluation; RA, risk assessment.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Table 7.

Summary of hypothesis testing.

More »

Table 7 Expand