Table 1.
Remote monitoring technologies in the RADAR-AD protocol.
Table 2.
The participating sites and the REC that approved the study.
Table 3.
Code frequencies per site.
Table 4.
Issues raised about data management.
Table 5.
Issues raised about participant’s wellbeing.
Table 6.
Issues raised about methodology.
Table 7.
Issues raised about definition of the devices.
Fig 1.
Duration in days of the REC process per site.
Blue blocks indicate the REC review, while orange blocks indicate the preparation of the response. The long preparation of response time in Amsterdam (second orange block) was because the REC requested approval from the IT department after the second REC review round, which resulted in several months waiting time. More detailed information can be found in the S1 Table.