Table 1.
Participants’ sociodemographic characteristics by experimental condition: L1 (Spanish) and L2 (English).
Table 2.
BAS and FAS values of the DRM lists as a function of backward associative strength (high-BAS and low-BAS lists) and language (L1 and L2).
Table 3.
Mean proportion of words whose meaning was known by participants as a function of type of word and BAS.
Table 4.
Mean proportion of “yes” responses to the different word types and the sensitivity index (d’) as a function of language and BAS.
Table 5.
Pearson’s correlations (p-values) between L2 proficiency and d’ measures for true and false recognition in the L2 as a function of BAS.
Fig 1.
Values for list-item d’ and critical-lure d’ as a function of associative strength (high BAS, low BAS) and language (L1, L2).
The error bars represent the standard error.