Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Diagrammatic representation of Mbovis physiopathology and possible distribution of biomarkers associated with ELISA and qPCR testing, with corresponding latent condition for LCA.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 1.

Parameters of prior Beta distributions for the main analyses.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Apparent seroprevalence for the slaughter sampling round (Delimiting population) and for National Beef Cattle Surveillance population, at different levels of ELISA SP% thresholds.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 2.

Proportion of herds in four categories of within-herd prevalence during the first round of on-farm testing (Delimiting population) at the 60 SP% ELISA threshold.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Overall apparent seroprevalence by sampling round in the Programme (Delimiting population), at threshold SP%=60.

The round denoted “S” represents the slaughter sampling round.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Correlation in titres between two subsequent rounds in the same animal with marginal titre distribution.

In red the SP%=60 positivity threshold for both distributions, in blue the abline y = x, upper right quadrant T1+T2+ (proportion = 1.64%), upper left quadrant T1-T2+ (proportion = 1.13%), lower right quadrant T1+T2- (proportion = 1.04%), lower left quadrant T1-T2- (proportion = 96.19%).

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Table 3.

Apparent seroprevalence (SP% threshold = 60 or 90) and prevalence of positive qPCR for cattle in farms from the North versus the South Island, in the slaughter population.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 5.

LCA model results (Median and CI) for varying levels of ELISA positivity threshold.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Table 4.

Estimated accuracy estimates for ELISA and qPCR for LCA models using ELISA positivity thresholds of SP% = 60 or 90).

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Estimated overall true prevalence of infection for cattle from the North versus the South Island, in models using ELISA positivity thresholds of SP%=60 or 90.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Table 6.

Summary measures of probabilities Cp and Cn for ELISA positivity thresholds of SP%=60 or 90 (expressed in percentages).

More »

Table 6 Expand

Table 7.

Summary measures of test accuracy and true prevalence estimates of”exposure to Mbovis” in the slaughter population, using constrained specificity priors inferred from the National Beef Cattle Surveillance data, for ELISA positivity threshold of SP%=60 or 90.

More »

Table 7 Expand

Fig 6.

Summary measures of test accuracy and true prevalence estimates of “exposure to Mbovis” in the slaughter population.

Obtained with constrained ELISA specificity priors using information from National Beef Cattle Surveillance, for ELISA positivity threshold of SP%=60 (left) or 90 (right).

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

Proportion of misclassified herds (scenario 1).

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Fig 8.

Proportion of misclassified herds (scenario 2).

More »

Fig 8 Expand