Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Frontal view and road geometry of the driving simulator.

A: Participants drove a car on a left lane of a monotonous expressway at night, following a leading car driven at 95 km/h. B: The black thick line indicates the road structure for one driving session. The participant’s car ran from Start to End. The arrow lines with Trial1 -3 indicate the road segments for SDLP measurement, and physiological measures (i.e., PERCLOS, SEM, and EEG). The length of the segment is suitable for driving the car for 5-minutes, with a maintained speed of 95 km/h. KSS1—3 indicate the positions of presenting a synthesized voice of “KSS,” which requests the response of the KSS to the participant.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 1.

Typical behaviors for observer rating of drowsiness.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Time course of drowsiness measures.

Each drowsiness measure averaged across 17 participants, was plotted against trial order. The drowsiness measures are, A: observer ratings of drowsiness (ORD), B: Karolinska sleepiness scale (KSS), C: standard deviation of lateral position (SDLP), D: percentage of eye closure (PERCLOS), E: the percentage of time occupied by slow eye movements (SEM), F: electroencephalographic (EEG) alpha power, and G: EEG theta power. Error bars indicate standard error. Lines connecting markers indicate the trials in one session. Gray area in each plot indicates lunch time.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Relations between the ORD and other drowsiness measures.

A: KSS, B: SDLP, C: PERCLOS, D: Percentage of time occupied by SEM, E: EEG alpha power and F: EEG theta power. Each marker indicates the data of one trial. Each color indicates a participant.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 2.

Correlation coefficients after Fisher’s z-transformation between drowsiness measures.

More »

Table 2 Expand