Fig 1.
Workflow summary.
Fig 2.
Study area (Dali Bai Autonomous Prefecture, Yunnan Province, China).
Notes: a. China; b. Yunnan Province; c. Dali Bai Autonomous Prefecture. The base map images are from the China Ministry of Natural Resources(http://bzdt.ch.mnr.gov.cn/index.html). The drawing approval number is GS (2016)1593.
Table 1.
Data sources and descriptions.
Table 2.
Tourism resource categories.
Table 3.
Analysis of the tourism resources and number of reviews in different periods.
Fig 3.
Spatial distribution of tourists’ perceived tourism resources.
Notes: a. Kernel density map of tourists’ perceived tourism resources; b. Perceived degree of humanistic resources; c. Perceived degree of natural resources; d. Perceived degree of recreation and tourism resources. The circle in the graph represents the number of reviews, i.e. the larger the circle, the more reviews. The graph in the upper-left corner indicates the geospatial distribution of different types of tourism resources. The base map images are from the China Ministry of Natural Resources(http://bzdt.ch.mnr.gov.cn/index.html). The drawing approval number is GS (2016)1593.
Table 4.
Influencing factors’ q-value results.
Fig 4.
Changes in the influencing factors during different periods.
Notes: a. Change in the q-value of traffic accessibility; b. Change in the q-value of socioeconomic factors; c. Change in the q-value of the natural environment; d. Change in the q-value of core resources.