Table 1.
Biochemical traits in leaf and reproductive bud tissues of regular and alternate bearer mango scion varieties as affected by rootstocks.
Table 2.
Primary and secondary nutrients in leaf and reproductive tissues of regular and alternate bearer scion varieties of mango as affected by rootstocks.
Fig 1.
Protein content (A) and C/N ratio (B) of leaf and the reproductive bud of the regular bearer and alternate bearer mango varieties as affected by rootstocks. The LSD (p≤ 0.05) for protein; rootstock, 0.05, 0.14; scion variety, 0.05, 0.11; and rootstock x scion variety, 0.08, 0.20 for leaf and bud respectively and for C/N ratio; rootstock, 0.28, 1.43; scion variety, 0.23; NS, and rootstock x scion variety, 0.40, 2.02 for leaf and bud respectively. LABD; leaf of alternate bearer Dashehari, LRA, the Leaf of regular bearer ‘Amrapali’; BABD, the bud of alternate bearer ‘Dashehari’; BRA, the bud of regular bearer ‘Amrapali’.
Fig 2.
Content of Mg (A), S (B), and Zn (C) in leaf and reproductive bud tissues of the regular bearer and alternate bearer mango varieties as affected by rootstocks. The LSD (p≤ 0.05) for Mg; rootstock, 0.03, 0.08; scion variety, NS, 0.07; and rootstock x scion variety, 0.05, 0.12 for leaf and bud respectively and for S; rootstock, 0.009, 0.03; scion variety, 0.007, 0.02; and rootstock x scion variety, 0.10, 0.04 for leaf and bud respectively, for Zn; rootstock, 0.88, 1.30; scion variety, 0.72, 1.06; and rootstock x scion variety, 1.25, 1.83 for leaf and bud, respectively. LABD; leaf of alternate bearer Dashehari, LRA, the Leaf of regular bearer ‘Amrapali’; BABD, the bud of alternate bearer ‘Dashehari’; BRA, the bud of regular bearer ‘Amrapali’.
Table 3.
Micronutrients contents in leaf and reproductive bud tissues of regular and alternate bearer scion varieties of mango as affected by rootstocks.
Table 4.
Leaf gas exchange parameters, intrinsic water use efficiency and carboxylation capacity of regular and alternate bearer scion varieties of mango as affected by rootstock.
Fig 3.
Total chlorophyll (A) and carotenoid content (B) of leaf tissues of the regular bearer and alternate bearer mango varieties as affected by rootstocks. The LSD (p≤ 0.05) for total chlorophyll; rootstock, 0.07; scion variety, 0. NS; and rootstock x scion variety, 0.10 and for total carotenoids; rootstock, 0.02; scion variety, NS; and rootstock x scion variety, 0.03. LABD; leaf of alternate bearer Dashehari, LRA, the Leaf of regular bearer ‘Amrapali’; BABD, the bud of alternate bearer ‘Dashehari’; BRA, the bud of regular bearer ‘Amrapali’.
Fig 4.
Stomatal density (A) and pictorial representation of stomatal density (10 X) (B). The LSD (p≤ 0.05) rootstock, 0.05; scion variety, 0.05; and rootstock x scion variety.
Table 5.
Variance explained by Principal Component (6 Basic Component) in scion/rootstock combinations of mango.
Fig 5.
Heatmap and hierarchical clustering for physiological and nutritional parameters of the leaf (A) and bud tissues (B) in alternate and regular bearer mango varieties grafted on different rootstocks. A; Amrapali, D; Dashehari, Ol; Olour, Ku; Kurukkan, NDS; non-descriptive seedlings.
Fig 6.
Genetic tree using carbohydrate metabolism specific primers of the regular bearer and alternate bearer mango varieties as affected by rootstocks.
Table 6.
Genetic variability indices of the 13 polymorphic carbohydrate metabolism specific primers among the set of 15 scion/rootstock combinations of mango.