Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Compressive strength values of the V1, VZ0.5, and V1.0 scaffolds compared with the values of trabecular and cortical bone [20].

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 1.

Scaffolds before being evaluated in vitro V1 (a), VZ0.5 (b) and VZ1.0 (d), after 7 days of immersion in artificial saliva V1 (d), VZ0.5 (e) and VZ1.0 (f), and after 14 days of immersion in artificial saliva V1 (g), VZ0.1 (h) and VZ0.1 (i).

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Flower-like structure of the V1 scaffold after 14 days of immersion in artificial saliva.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Representation of the formation process of hydroxyapatite crystals with flower-like morphology.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

EDS images of the V1, VZ0.5, and VZ1.0 scaffolds, after 7 and 14 days of immersion in artificial saliva.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Ca/P ratio average of the V1, VZ0.5, and VZ1.0 scaffolds after immersion in artificial saliva at days 7 and 14, respectively.

More »

Fig 5 Expand