Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Schematic illustration of the proposed graphene SPR sensor for SARS-CoV-2 S-protein detection.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Reflectance (R) of the proposed sensor structure in Kretschmann configuration against layer thicknesses of (a) WS2, (b) KNbO3, (c) BP (solid) and BlueP (dashed), and (d) Graphene.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 1.

Refractive indices and thicknesses of the proposed sensor layers.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 3.

Sensing layer refractive index (ns) vs. SARS-CoV-2 S-protein concentration for 100-μL and 200-μL PBS solutions.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

(a) Simulation setup in the xy plane and (b) Material layers in the simulation domain.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

(a) R-profile of the proposed graphene SPR sensor for different SARS-CoV-2 S-protein concentrations as a function of θi. In this case, SARS-CoV-2 S-proteins are added to 100-μL PBS solution. (b) Δθr against SARS-CoV-2 S-protein concentration for 100-μL and 200-μL PBS solution.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Table 2.

Comparisons of LoD of the proposed sensor with different recently proposed sensors for SARS-CoV-2 S-protein detection.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 6.

(a) SR and (b) KD as a function of S-protein concentration of the proposed graphene SPR sensor for 100-μL and 200-μL PBS solutions.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

(a) S and (b) FoM using BP and (c) S and (d) FoM using BlueP as a function of S-protein concentration of the proposed graphene SPR sensor for 100-μL and 200-μL PBS solutions.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Fig 8.

(a) Dispersion relations of the proposed sensor when the S-protein concentration is 1 fM using BP. The most left straight line is the light line, (b) Propagation length, and (c) Propagation loss of the proposed sensor as a function of the SARS-CoV-2 S-protein concentration for 100-μL and 200-μL PBS solutions.

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Table 3.

Performance comparison of our proposed sensor with different recently proposed sensors.

More »

Table 3 Expand