Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Reference gene candidates evaluated by this study and their qPCR amplification efficiency.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 1.

Stability ranking of 8 candidate reference genes by Bestkeeper.

Higher stability index is associated with higher stability. (A) Early, highly avascular time point, P14.5. (B) Late time point where neovascularization is peaking, P20. (C) Comprehensive ranking of reference genes across both time points of P14.5.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Stability ranking of 8 candidate reference genes by Normfinder.

Lower stability index is associated with higher stability. (A) Early, highly avascular time point, P14.5. (B) Late time point where neovascularization is peaking, P20. (C) Comprehensive ranking of reference genes across both time points of P14.5.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Stability ranking of 8 candidate reference genes by geNorm.

Lower stability index is associated with higher stability. (A) Early, highly avascular time point, P14.5. (B) Late time point where neovascularization is peaking, P20. (C) Comprehensive ranking of reference genes across both time points of P14.5.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Stability ranking of 8 candidate reference genes by RefFinder.

Lower stability index is associated with higher stability. (A) Early, highly avascular time point, P14.5. (B) Late time point where neovascularization is peaking, P20. (C) Comprehensive ranking of reference genes across both time points of P14.5.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Table 2.

Summary of reference gene rankings by 3 primary algorithms and RefFinder, a summary tool, at each timepoint, P14.5, P20, and a comprehensive ranking of both timepoints.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 5.

The percentage difference of expression level of Alox-15 in neonatal rat retinas normalized by different reference genes compared to TBP normalization at P14.5 by percentage (A), by fold change (C) and at P20 by percentage (B), and by fold change (D). Fold change was calculated by the 2−ΔΔCt method. All results are expressed as relative amounts to the RA group of the respective time point.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

OIR and PIA animal models and experimental groups.

In OIR groups, every 24 hours, the oxygen concentration was switched between 50% and 10% FiO2 until P14 when they were removed to room air (21% FiO2). Phlebotomy to induce PIA occurred from P3- P20 on hyperoxia days only, to prevent variation in oxygen concentrations during the highly sensitive hypoxia periods. Hematocrit levels of controls and PIA pups are shown. Bottom panel shows the experimental groups and timing of EPO administration.

More »

Fig 6 Expand