Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Overview of the proposed method.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Contour curve fragments of the arabic letter ain.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

How to compute CPCA feature attributes at point Pi.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

How to compute CON3 feature attributes at point Pi.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Writer identification with respect to contour fragment length on IAM and KHATT datasets.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Writer identification with respect to GAP parameter on IAM and KHATT datasets.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

Writer identification with respect to angular quantization on IAM and KHATT datasets.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Fig 8.

Writer identification with respect to line segment length on IAM and KHATT datasets.

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Fig 9.

Writer identification with respect to distance quantization parameters Nq and Nl on IAM and KHATT datasets.

More »

Fig 9 Expand

Fig 10.

Writer identification with respect to Ø angle quantization on IAM and KHATT datasets.

More »

Fig 10 Expand

Table 1.

The impacts of the available handwritten text.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 11.

Writer identification with respect to the number of writes using NN classifier on IAM and KHATT datasets.

More »

Fig 11 Expand

Fig 12.

Writer identification with respect to the number of writes using SVM classifier on IAM and KHATT datasets.

More »

Fig 12 Expand

Fig 13.

Writer identification with respect to the codebook size using NN classifier on IAM and KHATT datasets.

More »

Fig 13 Expand

Fig 14.

Writer identification with respect to the codebook size using SVM classifier On IAM and KHATT datasets.

More »

Fig 14 Expand

Table 2.

CPCA results on IAM dataset.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

CON3 results on IAM dataset.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

COMBINED FEATURES results on IAM dataset.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

CPCA results on KHATT dataset.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Table 6.

CON3 results on KHATT dataset.

More »

Table 6 Expand

Table 7.

COMBINED FEATURES results on KHATT dataset.

More »

Table 7 Expand

Table 8.

Comparison to the state-of-the-art writer identification methods for IAM dataset.

More »

Table 8 Expand

Table 9.

Comparison to the state-of-the-art writer identification methods for KHATT dataset.

More »

Table 9 Expand

Fig 15.

Proposed system misclassification errors.

More »

Fig 15 Expand

Fig 16.

(a). The runtime of different system steps on IAM dataset using CON3 Feature. (b). The runtime of different system steps on IAM dataset using CPCA Feature.

More »

Fig 16 Expand

Fig 17.

(a). The runtime of different system steps on KHATT dataset using CON3 Feature. (b). The runtime of different system steps on KHATT dataset using CPCA Feature.

More »

Fig 17 Expand