Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Flow diagram for participant selection.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Schematic flow for study group classification and analysis.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 1.

Comparison of baseline characteristics between slow and rapid eGFR progressor in twins stratified by high or low discordance of eGFR decline rate.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 3.

Blood glucose and hemoglobin levels according to the difference in eGFR decline in twins.

With the dotted line as the center, the plot on the left and right represent (A) glucose and (B) hemoglobin levels in the low and high discordance groups, respectively. Circular dots indicate the slow progressor among the twins, whereas the triangular dots indicate the rapid progressor. The lines connecting the circle and triangle dots represent each pair of twins.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 2.

Logistic regressions for high discordance twins in eGFR decline rate according to intra-twin difference in each clinical variable.

More »

Table 2 Expand