Table 1.
Clinical and demographic data of all subjects included.
Fig 1.
Measurement of the conjugated eye deviation (CED) on a healthy control subject with almost no deviation from midline (A) and on a patient with spatial neglect (B).
A line was drawn through the middle section as a „line of best fit“, another two lines were drawn through the ocular axis [11]. The numbers correspond to the measured angles of intersection between the midline and the line of the respective ocular axis.
Fig 2.
Overlap of the normalized lesions of the two right brain damaged patient groups.
The lesion maps were superimposed on the single-subject T1 MNI152 template. For each voxel, the number of patients with a lesion at that location is color coded. The vertical z coordinate for each slice of standardized MNI space is given.
Fig 3.
Degree of the horizontal eye deviation of the three subject groups.
Positive values indicate horizontal deviation towards the ipsilesional side; negative values horizontal deviation towards the contralesional side. The CED of each patient was calculated through the average of the deviation of both eyes. The boxplot shows the median and quartile distribution of the CED on the different subject groups.