Fig 1.
Study framework and participants.
Table 1.
Occupational hazard factors and OHS efforts questionnaire items (number of questions).
Fig 2.
OHSMS standard structuring.
Table 2.
Characteristics of the study participants.
Table 3.
Occupational hazard level in four workplace types.
Fig 3.
Detailed occupational hazard factors perceived by members of the four different work types in the ROKN workplaces.
(A) Biochemicals, (B) Physical burden, (C) Mechanical and electric, and (D) Work environment. Data were presented as the percentage of moderate or high-hazard levels (≥3 points) for each component.
Table 4.
Comparison of OHS efforts between workplaces to which OHSMS applied and unapplied in military engineering and ordnance ammunition types.
Table 5.
Comparison of OHS efforts by operating period (2–5 years) according to the time of OHSMS application (2017–2020) in repair and maintenance type.
Table 6.
Adjustment importance weights and priorities of OHSMS components through AHP-entropy analysis.
Fig 4.
The average of X-axis (performance) is 4.495, and the average of Y-axis (importance) is 0.045.