Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Text simplification resources for English/Spanish.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 1.

Corpus building methodology.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 2.

An extract of the target/synonym dataset for human evaluation with Group 1 (people with mild intellectual disabilities) and Group 2 (older people).

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

EASIER corpus statistics.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

EASIER corpus—CWI dataset results where N: nouns, V: verbs, A: adverbs, I: Interjections, PN: proper nouns, M: multi- words.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Fig 2.

Annotations between annotator 2 and 3.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 5.

Participant demographic information for corpus study (Group 1: Elder people, Group2: People with intellectual disabilities, Group 3: Control users).

More »

Table 5 Expand

Table 6.

Result metrics for both groups in Task 1 where ID = User Id, AC = Acuraccy, PR = Precision and Group 1: older people, Group 2: people with intellectual disabilities and Group 3: control users.

More »

Table 6 Expand

Fig 3.

Precision scores among every participant divided into groups, where Group 1: older people, Group 2: people with intellectual disabilities and Group 3: control users.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Recall scores among every participant divided by groups, where Group 1: older people, Group 2: people with intellectual disabilities and Group 3: control users.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Number of detected complex words, divided by groups, where Group 1: older people, Group 2: people with intellectual disabilities and Group 3: control users.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Table 7.

Task2: Number of cases where at least one candidate, two candidates and all candidates were ranked as correct, sorted by groups and sentences where Grp 1: older people, Grp 2: people with intellectual disabilities and Grp 3: control users.

More »

Table 7 Expand

Fig 6.

Number of instances where at least one substitute was taken as correct of incorrect, divided by group and education level, where Group 1: older people, Group 2: people with intellectual disabilities and Group 3: control users.

More »

Fig 6 Expand