Fig 1.
Nomogram of the proposed model.
H1 = a3: Cognitive proximity → Innovative performance. H2 = a1 x b1: Cognitive proximity → PACAP → Innovative performance. H3 = a2 x c1: Cognitive proximity → RACAP → Innovative performance. H4 = a1 x b2 x c1: Cognitive proximity → PACAP → RACAP → Innovative performance.
Table 1.
Assessment of internal consistency and convergent validity.
Table 2.
Evaluation of discriminant validity.
Table 3.
Summary of direct effects.
Table 4.
Summary of indirect effects.