Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Example scenario comparison in DCE portion of the survey.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 1.

Attributes and levels selected for conjoint analysis.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Nephrologists’ demographics and facility characteristics.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 2.

Average patient attribute importance.

Factors that trigger treatment for VDI and SHPT in patients with pre-dialysis CKD stage 3–5; ordered by relative importance as indicated by conjoint analysis part-worth utilities.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Average part-worth utilities.

Displayed by patient attribute and levels within each attribute.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Patient profiles by likelihood to receive treatment with a VDT.

Based on addition of average part worth utility values of selected patient attributes and their levels and comparison with the average part worth none utility value of 20.

More »

Fig 4 Expand