Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Study flowchart.

AF, atrial fibrillation; NOAC, non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant; ESRD, end-stage renal disease; LC, liver cirrhosis.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 1.

Clinical characteristics in NOAC users.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Time-specific proportions of high and low adherence patients for NOACs.

NOAC, non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant; M, month; Y, year; Apix/Dabi, apixaban or dabigatran; Edox/Riva, edoxaban or rivaroxaban; *p value <0.05 compared with Edox/Riva users; p value < 0.001 compared with dabigatran users; p value < 0.05 compared with dabigatran users.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Time-specific PDC for each NOAC.

PDC, proportion of days covered; NOAC, non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant; M, month; Y, year; Apix/Dabi, apixaban or dabigatran; Edox/Riva, edoxaban or rivaroxaban; *p value < 0.001 compared with Edox/Riva users; p value < 0.001 compared with dabigatran users; p value < 0.01 compared with dabigatran users.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

The cumulative incidence curves of clinical outcomes for patients with high and low adherence to NOACs: Composite outcome, stroke, acute myocardial infarction (AMI), and death.

CI, confidence interval.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Comparative clinical outcomes of each NOAC in high and low adherence groups.

NOAC, non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; AMI, acute myocardial infarction.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Table 2.

Event and event rate in NOAC users in the overall study population and the comparative risks for clinical outcomes of patients with low adherence compared with those with high adherence in propensity score-matched population.

More »

Table 2 Expand