Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Flow chart of comprehensive evaluation method.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Hydraulic radius determination method diagram.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Mathews stability chart.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Limit span method (under the condition of no support or local support).

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Determination of limit span of the stope.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Self-stabilization time judgment based on RMR classification.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Table 1.

Jv and Kv comparison table.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

ESR value.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 7.

Q system rock classification and support chart.

In this figure: ①No support required; ②Point anchor support;③System bolt support; ④System bolt support (plain shotcrete, thickness of 4~5cm); ⑤System bolt and steel fiber shotcrete, thickness 5~9cm; ⑥System bolt and steel fiber shotcrete, thickness of 9~12cm; ⑦System bolt and steel fiber shotcrete, thickness of 12~15cm; ⑧System bolt and steel fiber shotcrete, thickness > 15cm, plus shotcrete reinforced ribs; ⑨Mold concrete lining.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Fig 8.

The algorithm flow chart of stope stability comprehensive evaluation system.

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Fig 9.

Location of Jiaojia Gold Mine.

More »

Fig 9 Expand

Fig 10.

Experimental evaluation of stope design.

More »

Fig 10 Expand

Fig 11.

Drawing of rock mass structural plane of measuring point in the -570m level by Sirovision.

More »

Fig 11 Expand

Fig 12.

Schmitt diagram and rose diagram of joint in the -570m level (a) Schmitt diagram; (b) rose diagram.

More »

Fig 12 Expand

Table 3.

Structural plane information in the -570m level.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 13.

ZTR-276 rock triaxial test system.

More »

Fig 13 Expand

Fig 14.

Process curve of rock uniaxial compression in the -570m level of Sizhuang mining area.

More »

Fig 14 Expand

Table 4.

Uniaxial compression test results of the -570m level rock.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Rock classification summary.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Table 6.

Results of three-layer.

More »

Table 6 Expand

Table 7.

Results of four-layer.

More »

Table 7 Expand

Fig 15.

Stope investigation (a)Stope investigation; (b)Work face of three-layer; (c)Work face of four-layer.

More »

Fig 15 Expand

Fig 16.

Stope failure in four-layer (a) Bolt support failure; (b) Roof Caving; (c) Cracking of side concrete; (d) Roof concrete caving.

More »

Fig 16 Expand