Table 1.
Basic characteristics of the three samples.
Means and standard deviations (in parenthesis) or proportions are given.
Fig 1.
Relationships between mass spectrometry-based metabolites and waist-hip ratio (WHR) in males and females and vs fat mass in both sexes combined.
Only metabolites showing a false discovery rate (FDR) <0.05 in both the discovery and validation analyses in both sexes are shown. The estimates are from the validation meta-analysis of the PIVUS and POEM samples. The betas are for one SD change in WHR or fat mass. Also 95%CIs are given.
Table 2.
Relationships between mass spectrometry-based metabolites and waist-hip ratio adjusted for fat mass (WHRadjfatmass) in males and females and vs fat mass in both sexes combined.
Table 3.
Relationships between mass spectrometry-based metabolites and waist-hip ratio (WHR) in males and females and vs fat mass in both sexes combined.
Fig 2.
Relationships between nuclear magnetic resonance spectrometry-based lipoprotein metabolites and waist-hip ratio (WHR) in males and females in both sexes combined.
Only metabolites showing a false discovery rate (FDR) <0.05 in both the discovery and validation analyses in both sexes are shown.
Table 4.
Relationships between nuclear magnetic resonance spectrometry-based lipoprotein metabolites and waist-hip ratio (WHR) in males and females and vs fat mass in both sexes combined.