Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Four-step process of the empirical survey.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Composition of projects for the research calls Stadt der Zukunft (average for the years 2019, 2020, 2021), Energieforschung (average for the years 2017, 2018, 2019, no data were available for the years 2020 and 2021.), and Vorzeigeregion.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 1.

Share of project leads per partner category.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 3.

Scatter plot of Number of organizations per project (incl. lead partner) against funding in k€.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Responses of the verification sample (see chapter 2.2.3) to the question “what total number of days they and their organization in total spent preparing proposals”.

Each bar represents one response.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Table 2.

Outlier detection.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Analysis of the remaining data: Minimum, Maximum, Median, Standard Deviation.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 5.

Responses to the question “How much time in days did your organization spend working on the proposal overall (including your days)?”.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Days (as a continuous variable) spent by the researchers’ organization to prepare a research proposal either as partner (blue) or as lead (red) for the corresponding budget (as a categorical variable).

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

Days (as a continuous variable) spent by the researchers’ organization to prepare either a new (blue) or resubmitted (red) research proposal for the corresponding budget (as a categorical variable).

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Table 4.

Responses to the question “How much time in days did your organization spend working on the proposal overall (including your days)?” for different categories.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Aggregated data: Medians, Means and 95% confidence intervals.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Fig 8.

The time required to write hypothetical proposals as a function of the acceptance rate in order to fund a single hypothetical project.

The acceptance rate of 17% is the acceptance rate of the research call Energieforschung in 2018 [29].

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Fig 9.

Share of responses for the different categories; responses were collected as single choice for the categories shown on the x axis.

Each bar represents the share of responses for the respective category.

More »

Fig 9 Expand

Fig 10.

Responses from research based on a 5-point Likert scale.

More »

Fig 10 Expand

Fig 11.

Responses from industry based on a 5-point Likert scale.

More »

Fig 11 Expand

Fig 12.

Share of responses for the different categories; responses were collected as single choice for the categories shown on the x axis.

Each bar represents the share of responses for the respective category.

More »

Fig 12 Expand