Table 1.
Demographic characteristics of TBI and control participants.
Fig 1.
Frequency of self–reported lasting difficulties according to self-reported location of damage.
Fig 2.
Sea Hero Quest visual examples of wayfinding and path integration levels.
Wayfinding levels 6, 8 and 11 presented in A, B, and C respectively. Path integration level 4 is presented in D.
Table 2.
Results of Mann–Whitney U test on distance and duration metrics on all wayfinding tasks between TBI and control group.
Table 3.
Results of Mann–Whitney U test on map view duration on all wayfinding tasks between TBI and control group.
Fig 3.
Summary histogram of control group and TBI group distance performance on training and wayfinding levels plotted against population data.
Fig 4.
Histogram of distance metrics of patient A individually plotted against distance metrics of control population.
’N’ is the control sample size. The red dashed vertical line corresponds to the patient’s performance. Prctile is the percentile of the patient’s performance in the control distribution. P-value is the inverse (number of controls with worst performance / N).
Fig 5.
Histogram of distance metrics of patient B individually plotted against distance metrics of control population.
’N’ is the control sample size. The red dashed vertical line corresponds to the patient’s performance. Prctile is the percentile of the patient’s performance in the control distribution. P-value is the inverse (number of controls with worst performance / N).
Fig 6.
Frequencies of TBI and control participants as a function of overall flare accuracy on path integration levels.
Fig 7.
Frequencies of TBI and control participants as a function of flare accuracy (i.e., selection of correct starting location) on path integration levels.