Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

CONSORT flow diagram.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Sperm sex selection protocol.

For the study cohort, ejaculates were processed by a multilayer density gradient (Enhance-S Plus Cell Isolation Media, 100%; Vitrolife, Goteborg, Sweden) comprised of four concentrations: 20%, 40%, 60%, and 90%. After removing the seminal fluid, the resuspended sperm pellet was layered on top, and spermatozoa were able to self-select for 90 minutes at 4°C. Y-bearing spermatozoa were retrieved from the upper, 20% layer, and heavier X-bearing spermatozoa were retrieved from the bottom, 90% layer.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Patient flowchart.

A total of 1,317 couples undergoing ICSI cycles with preimplantation genetic testing were included in our study. Couples (n = 1,212) who did not desire a specific offspring sex underwent ICSI cycles with PGT-A solely for aneuploidy, while the remaining 105 elected to undergo ICSI with PGT-A for sex selection.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 1.

Demographics and semen parameters for the control and study groups according to sex.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Proportion of sperm cells enrichment and resulting embryos for female and male sex.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 4.

FISH assessment.

For couples selecting for female sex, our processing method was able to yield an increased proportion of X-bearing spermatozoa (left). Similarly, our method yielded a greater proportion of Y-bearing spermatozoa for couples selecting for male sex (right).

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Table 3.

ICSI outcomes by sex preference.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Ploidy of tested embryos for the control and study groups according to sex.

More »

Table 4 Expand