Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

FFBPNN structure.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Flow chart of FFBPNN.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Prediction flow chart of GM-FFBPNN model.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Study area: (A) The map of China; (B) The map of Beijing; (C) Site topography and geomorphology; (D) Ground fissures.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Drilling test: (A) Car drilling rig; (B) Rock sample.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Geophysical exploration test: (A) Diagram of instrument; (B) Results of geophysical exploration.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

The observation curve of monitoring points.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Table 1.

The measured data of N22 monitoring points.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 8.

Cumulative settlement and settlement velocity curve of N22 monitoring points.

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Table 2.

Model building results.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 9.

FFBPNN structure diagram.

More »

Fig 9 Expand

Fig 10.

Fitting regression diagram of subsidence prediction model.

More »

Fig 10 Expand

Table 3.

Comparison between original and predicted values of the two models.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Prediction accuracy test table.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Fig 11.

Comparison of predicted value and original value curve.

More »

Fig 11 Expand

Fig 12.

Comparison of four threshold denoising effect curves.

More »

Fig 12 Expand

Table 5.

Denoising quality evaluation table of different threshold methods.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Fig 13.

Approximate signal and detailed signal diagram after decomposition.

More »

Fig 13 Expand

Table 6.

Cumulative settlement and predicted value of N22 monitoring points after denoising.

More »

Table 6 Expand

Fig 14.

Comparison of residual value before and after denoising.

More »

Fig 14 Expand