Fig 1.
Location change detection task.
Note that the fixation cross is not displayed in this figure for illustrative purposes.
Fig 2.
Sensitivity (d’) across conditions for Experiment 1.
Error bars indicate the standard error of the mean (SEM).
Table 1.
p-values–t-tests for configurations in Experiment 1 across conditions.
Fig 3.
Sensitivity (d’) across conditions for Experiment 2.
Error bars indicate the standard error of the mean (SEM).
Fig 4.
Density plot: Distance of probed object to the center of the screen (during encoding) in Experiments 1 and 2.
Fig 5.
Predicted probabilities derived from the generalized linear mixed effect models to the experimental conditions of Experiments 1 and 2 to investigate the influence of the distance of the probed object to the center of the screen (during encoding) on hit rates and false alarm rates.
Table 2.
Type II Wald chi-square tests used to evaluate the significance of the main effects and interactions of distance (D), configuration (C), and location change (L) in the generalized linear mixed effect models fitted to the experimental conditions of Experiments 1 and 2.