Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Intelligent autonomous vehicle system.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Fundamentals of the PID control algorithm.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Architecture of autonomous vehicles based on edge computing.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Flow of the deviation detection algorithm.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Procedures of the greedy algorithm.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Membership functions of input and output variables (a) velocity deviation (b) acceleration deviation (c) brake pedal stroke change.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Table 1.

Fuzzy control rules.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 7.

Basic flow of the path-tracing algorithm.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Fig 8.

Membership function of input and output variables (a) heading deviation (b) preview distance (c) steering wheel angle change.

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Table 2.

Fuzzy control rules.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 9.

Flow of the CAW algorithm.

More »

Fig 9 Expand

Table 3.

Accuracy of two heuristic algorithms.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Running time of two heuristic algorithms.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Fig 10.

Experimental results of the vehicle control system (a) steering wheel angle curve (b) speed curve.

More »

Fig 10 Expand

Fig 11.

Changing curves of the emergency braking speed.

More »

Fig 11 Expand

Fig 12.

Model training results (a) Average prediction time (b) ROC curve.

More »

Fig 12 Expand

Fig 13.

Simulation results of anti-collision of front vehicle at rest (a) comparison between actual distance and expected distance (b) comparison between actual acceleration and expected acceleration (c) comparison of two vehicle speeds.

More »

Fig 13 Expand

Fig 14.

Anti-collision simulation results of the target vehicle driving at a constant speed (a) comparison between expected distance and actual distance (b) comparison between expected acceleration and actual acceleration (c) speed comparison between the two vehicles.

More »

Fig 14 Expand

Fig 15.

Anti-collision simulation results of the target vehicle’s emergency deceleration (a) Comparison between actual distance and expected distance (b) Comparison between actual acceleration and expected acceleration (c) Comparison of two vehicle speeds.

More »

Fig 15 Expand