Table 1.
Descriptive statistics—Sibling relationship quality scales.
Table 2.
Descriptive statistics—Parenting styles.
Table 3.
Test of normality.
Table 4.
Correlations of mother’s emotional relationship with siblings’ characteristics.
Table 5.
Correlations of mother’s behavioral control with siblings’ characteristics.
Table 6.
Correlations of father’s emotional relationship with siblings’ characteristics.
Table 7.
Correlations of father’s behavioral control with siblings’ characteristics.
Fig 1.
Results for theoretical model I relating maternal Warmth/freedom (F3) to siblings’ Warmth/Closeness (F2) and siblings’ Conflict (F1) with standardized coefficients.
ER = emotional relationship; F = freedom; compan = companionship; prosoc = prosociality; admBY = admiration by sibling. Source: IBM SPSS Amos.
Fig 2.
Results for theoretical model II relating paternal Warmth/freedom (F3) to siblings’ Warmth/Closeness (F2) and siblings’ Conflict (F1) with standardized coefficients.
ER = emotional relationship; F = freedom; compan = companionship; prosoc = prosociality; admBY = admiration by sibling. Source: IBM SPSS Amos.
Fig 3.
Results for theoretical model III relating maternal Warmth/freedom (F3) to siblings’ Warmth/Closeness (F1) with standardized coefficients.
ER = emotional relationship; F = freedom; compan = companionship; prosoc = prosociality; admBY = admiration by sibling. Source: IBM SPSS Amos.
Fig 4.
Results for theoretical model IV relating paternal Warmth/freedom (F3) to siblings’ Warmth/Closeness (F2) with standardized coefficients.
ER = emotional relationship; F = freedom; compan = companionship; prosoc = prosociality; admBY = admiration by sibling. Source: IBM SPSS Amos.
Table 8.
Fit indices of models.