Table 1.
Participants’ characteristics in the pre and the post phase.
Table 2.
Polarity profile for job satisfaction and workload.
Fig 1.
Factor analyses to identify the items of the scale on active individual knowledge transfer.
left: preliminary solution, right: final solution; numbers refer to item numbers in Table 3.
Table 3.
Scale on active individual knowledge transfer based on expert ratings (with average rating and standard deviation).
Table 4.
Means (and standard deviations) of job satisfaction, workload, technology acceptance and active knowledge transfer as a function of professional role.
Table 5.
Items concerning acceptance of the TEP system with means (and standard deviations) as a function of time (pre, post) and workload (low, high).
Fig 2.
Effect of satisfaction level (quartile groups from highest to lowest) on active knowledge transfer.
Fig 3.
Active knowledge transfer as a function of point in time (pre vs. post) and management position (leading vs. non leading).
Table 6.
Items concerning knowledge transfer with means (and standard deviations) as a function of position (leading vs. non leading), time (pre, post) and satisfaction (low, high).
Table 7.
Means (and standard deviation) for three-way interaction of point in time (pre vs. post), management position (leading vs. non leading) and satisfaction level (quartile 1 to 4) on active knowledge transfer.
Table 8.
Means (and standard deviations) of work satisfaction (1 = lowest to 10 = highest satisfaction) as a function of time (pre, post), experience level (low vs. high), and knowledge transfer (quartile 1 to 4).
Fig 4.
Impact of point in time (left) and interaction of time and experience (right) on satisfaction.
Table 9.
Success factors of transition process in the project Rural|Rescue [structured according to 8].