Fig 1.
Images of the experimental program: (a) Dimensions of a specimen; (b) Specimens after demolding; (c) Water curing of specimens; (d) Testing assembly.
Table 1.
Detail of mix proportion used during the experimental work.
Fig 2.
Sequence of ML and validation strategies adopted.
Fig 3.
Map of SVM strategy [67].
Fig 4.
Sequence of SVM technique [68].
Fig 5.
Sequence of BR technique [70].
Fig 6.
Schematic diagram of the k-fold validation technique.
Fig 7.
Influence of waste glass powder as cement substitute on FS of specimens.
Fig 8.
Influence of waste glass powder as a fine aggregate substitute on FS of specimens.
Fig 9.
SVM model: (a) Correlation among actual and estimated FS; (b) Dispersion of actual, estimated and error results.
Fig 10.
BR model: (a) Correlation among actual and estimated FS; (b) Dispersion of actual, estimated and error results.
Fig 11.
Outcomes of k-fold evaluation.
Table 2.
Statistical checks for the employed ML methods.
Table 3.
Results of k-fold evaluation for the employed ML models.