Fig 1.
CONSORT flow diagrams of the elderly people from Albertia Servicios Sociosanitarios and patients with lower limb disorders from Lescer Clinic.
Table 1.
Socio-demographic and clinical characteristics of patients from Lescer Clinic by gender, age and clinical condition.
Fig 2.
Pilot session with subjects with neuromotor disorders.
(A) Participant using the virtual cycling platform. (B) Capture of the first-person view of the virtual scenario ‘High Flight’.
Fig 3.
Workflow diagram of the Pedaling Virtual Platform user experience.
MOTOmed scheme [28].
Fig 4.
Boxplot distribution of IMI assessment: Interest/Enjoyment, Value/Usefulness, perceived choice.
Fig 5.
Boxplot distribution CEQ assessment: Credibility and expectancy.
Fig 6.
Boxplot distribution of Pre-Post SSQ assessment.
Fig 7.
Radar plot of normalized means of PQ subscales assessment.
Fig 8.
Boxplot distribution of GUESS-18 subscales.
Fig 9.
Boxplot distribution of SUS assessment of both groups.
Table 2.
Mean and standard deviation (SD) outcomes of Intrinsic Motivation Inventory (IMI), Credibility/Expectancy Questionnarie (CEQ) and System Usability Scale (SUS) of patients with neuromotor disorders.
The interpretation of the mean scores for each subscale is provided in the form: U = unacceptable outcome; A = acceptable outcome; HD = highly desirable outcome.
Table 3.
Mean and standard deviation (SD) outcomes of Simulator Sickness Questionnarie (SSQ) Pre-experimental test and post-experimental test, and differential values of elderly people.
The interpretation of the mean scores for each subscale is provided in the form: N = negligible; M = minimal; S = significant; C = concerning; U = undesirable.
Table 4.
Mean and standard deviation (SD) outcomes of Presence Questionnaire (PQ), Satisfaction Questionnaire (GUESS-18) and System usability Scale (SUS) of elderly people.
The interpretation of the mean scores for each subscale is provided in the form: U = unacceptable outcome; A = acceptable outcome; HD = highly desirable outcome.