Table 1.
Classification of coordination patterns.
Fig 1.
Mean coupling angle in RFS and FFS conditions.
Mean coupling angle for all subjects across stance phase for hip sagittal versus knee frontal (a), hip sagittal versus knee sagittal (b) and knee transverse versus ankle frontal (c) couples in RFS (solid line) and FFS (dash line) during slow10% (left column), normal (middle column) and fast10% (right column) running cadence. Each figure is divided into three parts, which represent the distribution proportion of RFS (slash) and FFS (white) in each coordination pattern during substance phases. * indicates a significant difference between groups (p < 0.05).
Fig 2.
Mean coupling angle during slow 10%, normal and fast 10% running cadence.
Mean coupling angle for all subjects across stance phase for hip sagittal versus knee frontal (a), hip sagittal versus knee sagittal (b) and knee transverse versus ankle frontal (c) couples in RFS (left column) and FFS (right column) during slow10% (grey line), normal (dash line) and fast10% (black line) running cadence. Each figure is divided into three parts, which represent the distribution proportion of slow10% (white), normal (grey) and fast10% (slash) in each coordination pattern during initial (left column), mid (middle column) and late (left column) stance phases. * indicates a significant difference between groups (p < 0.05).
Table 2.
M (P25 and P75) for coordination variability of selected couples at six running conditions during three stance subphases.