Table 1.
Descriptive characteristics of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey III analytic populationa.
Table 2.
Performance of unweighted versus weighted gradient boosting model implementations using data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey III.
Fig 1.
Performance of unweighted versus weighted gradient boosting model implementations by sample size (baseline simulations).
Table 3.
Performance of gradient boosting models configured and evaluated under different analytic scenarios, holding sample size constant at N = 10,000.
Fig 2.
Performance of unweighted versus weighted gradient boosting model implementations by weight variability and sample size.
Fig 3.
Performance of unweighted versus weighted gradient boosting model implementations by predictor strength and sample size.