Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Displays the absolute standard mean differences in sociodemographic characteristics of the sample depending on whether they had engaged in any of the examined aspects of advance care planning (ACP) or not.

On the left, green indicates the differences on sociodemographic characteristics after weighting. On the right, red indicates the differences before weighting. The figure shows that weighting effectively neutralized differences on these sociodemographic characteristics.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 1.

Demographic characteristics and treatment preferences of unweighted sample (N = 278).

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Odds of receiving value-concordant care by type of ACP (N = 278).

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Weighted proportion of patients receiving value-concordant care by treatment preference and type of advance care planning (N = 278).

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Odds of receiving value-concordant care by type of ACP using hospice for at least one week as sole indicator of value-concordant care (N = 275).

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Weighted proportion of patients receiving value-concordant care by treatment preference and type of advance care planning, using hospice for at least one week as sole indicator of value-concordant care (N = 275).

More »

Table 5 Expand