Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Diagram of the research model.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 1.

Socio-demographic characteristics of the participants by specialization.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Factor loadings from exploratory factor analysis for total sample (N = 600).

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Descriptive statistics and corrected item-total correlations of the 14 items corresponding to Competencies, Usefulness, Enjoyment, and Attitude scales (N1 = 300 (IBL) and N2 = 300 (INT)).

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Correlations between scores of the individual-level predictors (competencies, usefulness, and enjoyment) and effect (attitude).

Case study: IBL (N1 = 300)/INT (N2 = 300).

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

CFA factor loadings, t statistics and significance level for IBL and INT teaching strategies.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Table 6.

Reliability and validity for IBL and INT teaching strategies.

More »

Table 6 Expand

Table 7.

Discriminant validity for IBL (a) and INT (b) teaching strategies.

More »

Table 7 Expand

Fig 2.

Attitude Structural Equation Model for IBL (a) and INT (b).

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 8.

Specific direct effects and the effects size evaluation of the exogenous latent variables on the endogenous variable in their direct relationships for the total sample (a), IBL (b) and INT (c) teaching practices.

More »

Table 8 Expand

Table 9.

Specific indirect effects for the total sample (a), IBL (b) and INT (c) teaching practices.

More »

Table 9 Expand

Table 10.

PLS-MGA results.

More »

Table 10 Expand