Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Inter-state variation of urban-rural prevalence difference.

Source NFHS-IV, 2015–16; NFHS-III, 2005–06.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Inter-state variation of urban-rural prevalence ratio, 2015–16.

Source: Author’s preparation from NFHS IV datafiles.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

a-g. Spatial distribution of MGWR local coefficients (rural) at district level (significant areas only); the class of the local coefficient is classified by equal intervals. h-n. Spatial distribution of MGWR local coefficients (urban) at district level (significant areas only); the class of the local coefficient is classified by equal intervals. o and p. Spatial distribution of MGWR local coefficients at district level (significant areas only); the class of the local coefficient is classified by equal intervals. Source: Author’s preparation from NFHS IV datafiles.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 1.

Socio-demographic characteristics of study participants (n = 738265).

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Decomposition of rural-urban gap in obesity prevalence in India, NFHS, 2015–16.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 4.

Percentage contribution of each variable to the rural-urban gap in obesity prevalence in India, 2015–16.

Source: NFHS-1V, 2015–16.

More »

Fig 4 Expand