Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Sample item of the Perceptual Maze Test.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Missing data pattern for variables included in the analysis.

The bar chart on the left depicts the proportion of data missing for each variable. The graph on the right displays the different data patterns, with missing data in white and available data in blue. The histogram shows the frequency of the individual data patterns, with complete cases accounting for 28.0% of the total sample.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 1.

Fit indices for confirmatory factor analyses.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Zero-order correlations and internal consistency estimates (ω) for cognitive functioning composites for ages 3, 11, and 17 years for the imputed data.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Regression results for cognitive functioning at age 3 years predicted by early childhood risk factors (age 3 years) and sex.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Regression results for cognitive functioning at age 11 years predicted by early childhood risk factors (age 3 years) and cognitive functioning at age 3 years as well as sex.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Regression results for performance on the Trail Making Test at age 17 years predicted by early childhood risk factors (age 3 years) as well as cognitive functioning at ages 3 and 11 years and sex.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Table 6.

Regression results for performance on the Perceptual Maze Test at age 17 years predicted by early childhood risk factors (age 3 years) as well as cognitive functioning at ages 3 and 11 years and sex based on imputed data.

More »

Table 6 Expand

Fig 3.

Summary of cognitive functioning indicators for males and females at ages 3, 11, and 17 years based on imputed data.

More »

Fig 3 Expand