Table 1.
Access rates to the hypothesized protective factors, SDG-related outcomes and socio-demographic covariates across baseline and follow-up.
Fig 1.
Accelerator combinations leading to the strongest changes in adjusted probabilities for each mental health outcome.
Figure scales adjusted based on range of outcome values. Presence of all conditions based on symptom not clinical cut-offs (13). Good mental health: composite measure of the other three conditions. CBO = Access to community-based organisations, SC = Living in a Safe Community, CP = Caregiver Praise, FS = Food security, CM = Caregiver Monitoring. 95% confidence intervals included.
Fig 2.
Accelerator combinations leading to the strongest changes in adjusted probabilities for each behavioural outcome.
Figure scales adjusted based on range of outcome values. CBO = Access to community-based organisations, SC = Living in a Safe Community, CP = Caregiver Praise, FS = Food security, CM = Caregiver Monitoring. 95% confidence intervals included.
Fig 3.
Accelerator combinations leading to the strongest changes in adjusted probabilities for each school outcome.
Figure scales adjusted based on range of outcome values. CBO = Access to community-based organisations, SC = Living in a Safe Community, CP = Caregiver Praise, FS = Food security, CM = Caregiver Monitoring. 95% confidence intervals included.
Fig 4.
Accelerator combinations leading to the strongest changes in adjusted probabilities for each violence-related outcome.
Figure scales adjusted based on range of outcome values. CBO = Access to community-based organisations, SC = Living in a Safe Community, CP = Caregiver Praise, FS = Food security, CM = Caregiver Monitoring. 95% confidence intervals included.
Fig 5.
Accelerator combinations leading to the strongest changes in adjusted probabilities for SDG outcomes.
This figure depicts the predicted probabilities for an adaptive outcome for all 13 indicators, under the presence of no accelerator, the single most effective accelerator, the most effective combinations of two, three and four accelerators, and all five accelerators.
Table 2.
Summary of relative change in outcome probabilities conditional on incremental combinations of protective factors.