Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Data from an individual participant.

A: individual traces of root-mean-square (RMS) electromyographic activity (EMG) over 50 ms prior to single pulse stimulation during contractions at each % of maximal voluntary contraction (MVC). B: superimposed and resting twitches evoked by supramaximal tibial nerve stimulation for all trials at each % of MVC. Twitches are offset vertically for clarity. Colors in panels A and B indicate corresponding trials. C: maximal M waves from soleus, medial and lateral gastrocnemius. The RMS EMG was calculated from the first phase of the maximal M wave (gray shaded regions) using the method by Thomas [20]. The lower bounds of the gray shaded regions that indicate the first phase of the M waves are not horizontal because when the signal crossed 0, the closest sampled time points are sometimes slightly above or below 0 V. D: EMG normalized to maximal EMG as a function of voluntary activation. E: EMG normalized to Mmax as a function of voluntary activation. F: EMG normalized to maximal EMG as a function of EMG normalized to Mmax. The slope of each line indicates the scaling factor for that muscle. Legend for line styles in panel D indicates corresponding muscles in panels D, E and F. Data from individual trials in these panels are shown (black circles).

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Non-linear relationship between EMG and torque.

Electromyographic activity (EMG) in mV and ankle torque data from all participants (n = 25, 18 males) for A: soleus (SO), B: medial gastrocnemius (MG) and C: lateral gastrocnemius (LG) muscles. Torque is normalized to the maximal torque in the maximal voluntary contractions (MVCs) performed at the start of the protocol.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Effect of normalization method on the estimated level of muscle activation.

Data from each participant (n = 25, 18 males) of electromyographic activity (EMG) in each contraction level normalized to maximal EMG as a function of voluntary activation (panels A-C), EMG normalized to Mmax as a function of voluntary activation (panels D-F), and EMG normalized to maximal EMG as a function of EMG normalized to Mmax (panels G-I) for soleus (SO, panels A, D, G), medial gastrocnemius (MG, panels B, E, H) and lateral gastrocnemius (LG, panels C, F, I) muscles. Slopes of lines in panels G-I indicate scaling factors for participants and muscles.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 1.

Means, 95% confidence intervals (CI) and 95% prediction intervals of slopes of electromyographic activity (EMG) normalized to maximal muscle activity as a function of EMG normalized to the Mmax in the three plantarflexor muscles.

Slopes are ratios with no units.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Means (SD) of voluntary muscle activation (VA) and the electromyographic activity (EMG) in soleus (SO), medial gastrocnemius (MG) and lateral gastrocnemius (LG) normalized to maximal EMG (%max EMG) and normalized to Mmax (%Mmax).

EMG normalized to maximal EMG better estimates voluntary muscle activation than EMG normalized to Mmax.

More »

Table 2 Expand