Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Adaptive type-II progressive hybrid censoring model as proposed by Ng et al., (2009).

(a) Experiment ends before time T. (b) Experiment ends after time T.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

HF of the WD.

The HF of the WD with scale parameter β = 4 and different values for the shape parameter α.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

HF of the IWD.

HF of the IWD with a shape parameter α = 1.5 and different values for the scale parameter β.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

PDF of the IWD when.

α = 1.5.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

CDF of the IWD when.

α = 1.5.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Table 1.

Bias and MSE of θ with for different censoring schemes when θ = 0.4..

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Bias and MSE of θ with for different censoring schemes when θ = 0.4.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Bias and MSE of θ with T3 = Xm + 2 for different censoring schemes when θ = 0.4.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Bias and MSE of θ with for different censoring schemes when θ = 0.6.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Bias and MSE of θ with for different censoring schemes when θ = 0.6.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Table 6.

Bias and MSE of θ with T3 = Xm + 2 for different censoring schemes when θ = 0.6.

More »

Table 6 Expand

Table 7.

Bias and MSE of θ with for different censoring schemes when θ = 0.9.

More »

Table 7 Expand

Table 8.

Bias and MSE of θ with for different censoring schemes when θ = 0.9.

More »

Table 8 Expand

Table 9.

Bias and MSE of θ with T3 = Xm+2 for different censoring schemes when θ = 0.9.

More »

Table 9 Expand

Table 10.

Breakdown times (in minutes) for data I and data II.

More »

Table 10 Expand

Table 11.

Test statistic and p-value associated with each test for example 1.

More »

Table 11 Expand

Fig 6.

Estimated PDF of data I.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

Estimated PDF of data II.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Fig 8.

Q-Q plot for data I.

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Fig 9.

Q-Q plot for data II.

More »

Fig 9 Expand

Table 12.

Adaptive type-II censored samples form data I and data II.

More »

Table 12 Expand

Table 13.

Estimates of θ for example 1.

More »

Table 13 Expand

Table 14.

Bootstrap confidence intervals for the considered estimates of θ for example 1.

More »

Table 14 Expand

Table 15.

Standard error and average value for each estimate after bootstrapping for example 1.

More »

Table 15 Expand

Table 16.

Survival times (in months) for data 1 and data 2.

More »

Table 16 Expand

Table 17.

Test statistic and p-value associated with each test for example 2.

More »

Table 17 Expand

Fig 10.

Estimated PDF of data 1.

More »

Fig 10 Expand

Fig 11.

Estimated PDF of data 2.

More »

Fig 11 Expand

Fig 12.

Q-Q plot for data 1.

More »

Fig 12 Expand

Fig 13.

Q-Q plot for data 2.

More »

Fig 13 Expand

Table 18.

Adaptive type-II censored samples form data 1 and data 2.

More »

Table 18 Expand

Table 19.

Estimates of θ for example 2.

More »

Table 19 Expand

Table 20.

Bootstrap confidence intervals for each estimate of θ for example 2.

More »

Table 20 Expand

Table 21.

Standard error and average value for each estimate after bootstrapping for example 2.

More »

Table 21 Expand